The landscape of knowledge and information management is rich—but terminologically fragmented. We encounter a large set of overlapping concepts (e. g. PKM, PIM, PKIM, PWM, IL, IM, KM, KIM), various descriptions and definitions of what those concepts are, which goals they follow, and activities they include. Many terms in the field are used inconsistently, which leads to a lack of clarity that challenges communication, theoretical development, and the transfer of insights across disciplines.

This session addresses a simple but fundamental question: What exactly do we mean when we talk about managing (personal) knowledge? I will present a conceptual proposal and vocabulary for thinking about Personal Knowledge (and Information) Management, looking at the goals, objects, activities, and processes that define this concept. The proposed framework aims to clarify what we are actually managing (e.g., information, knowledge, data, competences, wisdom), which practices belong to which concepts, and how we can define the concepts through their final goals.

The aim of this session is not to impose definitions, but to invite critical discussion. When should we speak of PKM, PIM, PKIM, or other concepts? How can we move towards a more consistent vocabulary for the field? Are there inconsistencies we must or want to allow? I believe that by refining the language we use to describe our practices, we can strengthen the conceptual foundations of the PKM community and improve communication across disciplines.

Hammermüller, V. (2025). Personal Knowledge and Information Management. An Underestimated Competence for (Preservice) Music Teachers? https://doi.org/10.25972/OPUS-43277